DESCRIPTION

FUNCTION IN CCU VALUE CHAIN
- Transporting large volumes of CO2.
- Linking the capture phase with storage or utilization sites.
- Provide a steady and continuous flow.
LIMITATIONS
Pipeline transport of CO2 faces several limitations and challenges:
Technical
- Strict CO2 purity requirements, typically between 95-99%, are required to prevent corrosion and pipeline integrity.5
- Sensitivity to impurities such as H2O, SOx, and NOx.5
Economics
- High capital investment requirements for onshore and/or offshore pipeline infrastructure.
- Operating costs for compression, maintenance, and monitoring.
- Cost inefficiency for transporting small volumes of CO2 over long distances due to economies of scale.6
- Pipeline costs are proportional to distance.7
Regulatory & Environmental
- Complex permitting and approval processes for new pipeline projects.
- Safety aspects related to potential leaks could pose risks to both human health and the environment.
ENERGY
Electricity is the primary energy source for CO2 transport via pipelines.8 Mainly used for compression, pumping, and booster stations, which are essential for maintaining the pressure of the CO2 during transportation.
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Electricity (kWh/tCO2) | Variable (depending on booster station inlet and outlet pressure) |
COSTS
CO2 pipeline costs are divided into construction, operation and maintenance, and other expenses (e.g., design, insurance).9 Pipeline transport is CAPEX-intensive, and cost depends on distance, diameter, and terrain.7 Offshore pipelines are 40–70% more expensive due to higher pressure and lower temperature requirements.9 Larger diameters reduce per-unit transport cost. Terrain (e.g., wetlands, mountains) also impacts costs.2 Repurposing natural gas pipelines can cut costs to 1–10% of new builds4, but isn't ideal for high flow or long distances due to lower pressure ratings (class 600 vs 900 pipelines for CO2 pipelines).7
CAPEX: Capital investment costs of the pipeline as a function of its diameter can be estimated using the equation below.8
Y = 2.1575*X + 0.018
Where Y is the pipeline CAPEX in €/m and X is the pipe diameter in mm.
OPEX: Fixed OPEX is 2.6% of CAPEX.8
Variable OPEX are the costs associated with booster station electricity consumption. Booster station placement depends on the pipeline diameter and CO2 flow rate. A general rule is that a booster station is placed between 70 and 150 km with a pressure drop of 0.5 – 1.5 bar/km or an allowable pressure drop of 50 – 70 bar along the total pipeline length.8
Total CO2 transportation costs at 150 bar and 3.65 MtCO2/yr:8
Distance | Pipeline diameter* | Compression cost** | Transport cost*** |
---|---|---|---|
km | mm | €/tCO2 | €/tCO2 |
25 | 300 | 33.6 | 0.5 |
100 | 350 | 2.5 | |
200 | 400 | 5.7 | |
300 | 350 | 8.4 | |
400 | 350 | 11.8 | |
500 | 400 | 15.1 | |
*Reduction in optimal pipeline diameters after 200 km is attributed to the presence of booster stations influencing the overall cost. **Initial compression costs to a pressure of 73.8 bar (see separate infosheet on CO2 compression). ***Transport cost excluding initial compression costs. |
8 Pipeline capacity factor – 90%; interest rate – 8%; pipeline lifetime – 50 yrs; electricity price – 31 €/MWh; 2024 euros; CO2 transport capacity - 10,000 tCO2/d; compressor outlet pressure – 73.8 bar; compressor stages – 5; CO2 transport pressure – 150 bar; CO2 transport temperature – 30°C; allowable minimum pressure before booster pump – 100 bar.
10 Another source provides the costs for transporting pure CO2 using onshore and offshore pipelines for CO2 capacities in the range 1 – 20 MtCO2/yr. Lower capacities have higher transport costs.
Distance | Transport cost (onshore) | Transport cost (offshore) |
---|---|---|
km | €/tCO2 | €/tCO2 |
100 | 20 – 10 | 28 – 11 |
500 | 57 – 18 | 80 – 20 |
1000 | >80 – 28 | >80 – 38 |
1500 | >>80 – 35 | >>80 – 50 |
2000 | >>>80 – 42 | >>>80 – 68 |
10 Pipeline capacity factor – 85%; interest rate – 8%; pipeline lifetime – 25 yrs; electricity price – 80 €/MWh; 2017 euros; CO2 transport capacity - 1 – 20 MtCO2/yr; CO2 transport pressure – 150 bar for onshore and 200 bar for offshore pipelines.
TECHNOLOGY PROVIDERS
- CO2 pipelines by Fluxys, Belgium
- CO2 pipelines by NaTran, France
- CO2 pipelines by Equinor, Norway
- CO2 pipelines by ExxonMobil Pipeline Company, United States
- CO2 pipeline transportation by Kinder Morgan, United States
- CO2 pipeline services by DNV, Norway
ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
- Truck: Flexible for short distances, but higher operational costs.
- Rail: Offers a flexible and lower-capital option for smaller volumes, but higher OPEX.
Truck/Rail CO2 conditions: Liquid at -18 °C and 14-20 bar, water <30 ppmv, and oxygen <10 ppmv.11
- Ship: Suitable for offshore transport, flexibility in routes and distance (see infosheet).
Medium-pressure shipping: Liquid at -30 °C and 15 bar, water <30 ppmv, and oxygen <10 ppmv.11
Low-pressure shipping: Liquid at -50 °C and 6.5 bar, water <5 ppmv, and oxygen <10 ppmv.11
CONTACT INFO
Mohammed Khan (mohammednazeer.khan@vito.be)
Miet Van Dael (miet.vandael@vito.be)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This infosheet was prepared as part of the MAP-IT CCU project funded by VLAIO (grant no. HBC.2023.0544).
REFERENCES
1. Doctor R, Palmer A, Coleman D, et al. Transport of CO2. In: Pichs-Madruga R, Timashev S, eds. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge University Press; 2005:431.
2. IEA. CO2 Transport and Storage - Energy System. 2024. Accessed February 18, 2024. https://www.iea.org/energy-system/carbon-capture-utilisation-and-storage/co2-transport-and-storage
3. Knudsen J. Technology Data for Carbon Capture, Transport and Storage.; 2021. Accessed May 5, 2022. http://www.ens.dk/teknologikatalog
4. DNV. CO2 pipelines. 2024. Accessed February 18, 2024. https://www.dnv.com/focus-areas/ccs/carbon-pipelines.html
5. Serpa J, Morbee J, Tzimas E. Technical and Economic Characteristics of a CO2 Transmission Pipeline Infrastructure.; 2011.
6. Jakobsen J, Roussanaly S, Anantharaman R. A techno-economic case study of CO2 capture, transport and storage chain from a cement plant in Norway. J Clean Prod. 2017;144(2017):523-539.
7. ZEP. The Costs of CO2 Transport: Post-Demonstration CCS in the EU.; 2011.
8. Solomon MD, Scheffler M, Heineken W, Ashkavand M, Birth-Reichert T. Pipeline Infrastructure for CO2 Transport: Cost Analysis and Design Optimization. Energies . 2024;17(12).
9. Club CO2. CO2 transport. 2024. Accessed February 18, 2024. https://www.club-co2.fr/en/content/co2-transport
10. Roussanaly S, Deng H, Skaugen G, Gundersen T. At what Pressure Shall CO2 Be Transported by Ship? An in-Depth Cost Comparison of 7 and 15 Barg Shipping. Energies. 2021;14(5635):1-27.
11. NOV. CO2 Dehydration Product Offerings.; 2024. https://www.nov.com/-/media/nov/files/capabilities/carbon-capture-utilization-and-storage-solutions/co2-dehydration-product-offerings-brochure.pdf